My Son's Recovery from Autism- Without Pseudoscience!

A year ago, when I wrote "My Normal Baby's 12-Month Regression," I made a mental note to come back and update everyone in a year about my son's progress. After a significant developmnental regression, I knew that it was extremely likely that he, like his older sister, would be on the autism spectrum.

I never would have guessed just how remarkable the last year would be for my son. I never would have guessed that I would go from having an autistic one-year-old to a non-autistic two-year-old.
 Anti-vaxxers collectively spend millions on "curing" autism with bizarre treatment-- check out "10 Batshit Autism Treatments" for more on that-- but these treatments don't work and, worse, they're dangerous. I'm happy to say that my son was "cured" of autism in the only way that is backed by scientific study and endorsed by the Amerian Academy of Pediatrics.

I'll preface this with a (fictional) story. Suppose that a toddler's parents recognize that he is left-handed. There's a safe, effective method that can teach most left-handed toddlers to become ambidextrous, and the toddler's parents use it. Within a year, the toddler is functionally ambidextrous, and is able to use tools and machines designed for right-handed people, eliminating a problem that many lefties face.

This situation would not mean that a left-handed child is defective, or broken. It wouldn't mean that people should stop accommodating the needs of left-handed children and adults. It wouldn't change the fundamental fact that the child was born left-handed. It would simply mean that the child was given tools at an early age and was able to keep the good parts of being a lefty while never needing to worry that a classroom tool is made for someone else's grasp.

This is how I see my son. He was never broken and he was never in need of healing, but I gave him the ability to thrive in a world that is not made for people like him-- to such an extent that he effectively became neurologically "ambidextrous."
Darwin on his first day of school, last week.

My son Darwin's story goes like this:



At twelve months, Darwin had an extreme and sudden developmental regression. Since he had an older sister on the spectrum and had seemed "different" from birth, I contacted my community's Early Intervention program, which evaluated him and found that he had significant delays in several areas, including social-communication and motor skills. We began a weekly home-based program to address developmental problems including gross motor delays, extreme anxiety, sensory difficulties, disordered sleep, delayed speech, poor eye contact, and selective hearing.

At one point, Darwin's delays were so significant that I made myself come to terms with the possibility that he may grow up to be nonverbal-- the "bad" kind of autism that most parents fear.

Darwin's progress was by no means immediate. Even with Early Intervention, he did not walk until seventeen months and his sleep disturbances were so severe that, as a single mother, I was losing my mind. His neurologist suggested that I keep a tally chart to see how many times per night he was awakening, and I was disturbed to wake up and see fifteen to twenty tally marks every night. Several times, I fell asleep at stop-signs and red lights while driving his older sister to school. He would not respond to his name. He wouldn't speak to me. He wouldn't make eye contact.

At around a year and a half, it was pretty undeniable that Darwin was on the spectrum. His pediatrician, Early Interventionist, neurologist, and developmental pediatrician all agreed that it was unlikely that he was not autistic. Yet, he started to make progress, bit by bit.

In addition to his weekly Early Intervention meetings, where we discussed home-based strategies that would help him, Darwin received occupational therapy to help with his sensory processing difficulties. He also had speech therapy, which helped address early signs of echolalia (compulsive repetition of another person's words) and difficulty with auditory processing.

Every parent has a few moments in their child's development that they savor the most, those precious memories that they return to when they need to remember why it's all worthwhile. First words and first steps are common, but for the parents of special-needs kids, there are unsung milestones that matter just as much. I remember when Darwin finally (and suddenly) started speaking in real sentences. When he responded to his name. When he answered a question with "yes" or "no," instead of repetition. When he waved bye-bye for the first time following his regression. When he heard a washing machine and didn't scream in terror. When he let me buckle him into a car seat without a huge fight.

These memories mean everything to me. And, collectively, they added up to create the wonderful two-year-old that Darwin is today.

In the three weeks since Darwin's second birthday, we've had some amazing developments. He had his annual evaluation with Early Intervention, where we found that he'd gone from having severe delays in several areas, to being extremely advanced in every area tested. His social and communication skills are exceptionally advanced and he's finally hitting gross motor milestones on time.

 He speaks in long, complex sentences-- "Mama, if story time is over, would you like to rock in the rocking chair instead?"-- and plays well with his peers. He can run, jump with both feet on the ground, and initiate conversations with his peers. He started preschool last week and is thriving completely. He only wakes up once or twice a night and usually puts himself back to bed. Today, he "tested out" of occupational therapy and speech therapy, since he has no delays and his sensory processing abilities are now essentially typical.
Part of the summary sheet from Darwin's last home EI visit.

I couldn't possibly be more proud.

Given his monumental advances in the last couple of months, Darwin's care team now largely believes that he does not, at this point, have diagnosable autism. He has an evaluation scheduled for this November, after which I'll be able to say with certainty if he is currently autistic... But, at this point, I would be surprised if he meets any of the diagnostic criteria.

There's much about Darwin's story that is bittersweet. The part that hurts me the most is that I know, in my heart, that his sister would have had the same level of progress if I'd been as vigilant about evidence-based treatments, but I was so wrapped up in crunchy culture that I delayed and avoided these treatments when they would have been most effective. While she is happy and wonderful and thriving in her own way, it hurts as a mother to know that I could have helped her sooner but was too arrogant to do so. It hurts to know that her own struggles would have been far easier if I had put her needs ahead of my ideals.

I'm currently 24 weeks pregnant with a precious little boy, my third child. It's amazing to think about how much I have learned and grown as a parent through every step of my children's journeys. In my eight years as a mother, I have become a completely different person because of an ever-evolving struggle to be the parent my kids deserve. After all I've learned through my oldest two, I can't wait to see what my third will be able to teach me.

I don't want to change my kids. I don't believe that autism is a disease to be cured. However, I do want my children to be happy and healthy and to thrive to the best of their abilities. If I was able to "cure" Darwin's delays and sensory-processing difficulties to the point that he fell off the spectrum, I view that as something worth celebrating--

and as one more sign that the answers parents need are in science, not in naturalistic idealism.


Justice for Thalia Vida Gardner: Father Arrested

In March of 2015, I came across a series of Facebook posts from the family of a beautiful black-eyed baby girl named Thalia Vida Gardner. Her parents claimed that she had died unexpectedly after a serious adverse reaction to vaccines. They were, via GoFundMe, requesting thousands of dollars to "prove" that her death was a vaccine reaction.



It didn't take me long to find evidence calling those claims into question-- most notably, posts from concerned members of Thalia's family, who pointed out that her diagnosis at her time of death was traumatic brain injury, and that she had opiates in her system.

The entire tragic story is chronicled on the following posts:

Did Vaccines Really Kill Her?
12 Questions About Thalia Vida Gardner's Death
An Open Letter to Karla Gardner
Updates on Thalia Vida Gardner

In the long months that have passed since then, I have not had much of a break from this story. I've been badgered and berated by people asking me why there was no arrest, since many internet users don't seem to understand that an investigation like this can take months or years. Thalia's paternal grandmother has emailed me about once a month, telling me that her son isn't in jail and demanding that I remove screencaps from my blog. Jaci Rizzo-- the grandmother-- has even emailed my friends and relatives demanding that they somehow force me to remove blog posts that speak poorly of her son.

Most painfully, Thalia's story has led to many people personally attacking me and my integrity. Several commenters on previous articles accused me of completely fabricating Thalia's entire story for the purpose of driving traffic to my blog, and a now-widely-circulated "Open Letter to Juniper Russo" claimed that I was being well-paid by pharmaceutical companies to attack a grieving family.

I did none of those things. I have never profited in any way from Thalia's death and have no allegiance to anyone-- or anything-- besides justice. My motive has been, since day one, to see justice served, and to see other innocent children spared painful and horrific deaths.

Until now, I had no answer when people asked me why there was no arrest yet. I am not judge, jury, or law enforcement-- I'm only a concerned citizen who saw vaccines being blamed for what appeared to be a death caused by child abuse. Now, I finally have an answer.

On July 14, 2016, Thalia Vida Gardner's father, Tyler Justin Gardner, was arrested. He was specifically charged with child abuse and neglect with substantial bodily or mental harm-- a felony charge that, in his jurisdiction, carries a sentence of 6-15 years in prison. He is being held on $80,000 bail.



Tyler hasn't been convicted yet and is legally considered innocent until proven guilty. However, if 16 months of thorough investigation revealed child abuse-- rather than a vaccine injury-- I think it's at least safe to say that Thalia's death was not vaccine-related.

I will update readers if and when there is a conviction. In the mean time, I ask that followers stop harassing me and my family, and that everyone keep those who loved Thalia in their thoughts and prayers.





Five Celebrities You Didn't Know Were Woo-tastic



Some woo-tastic celebrities are well-known and obvious. You got Jenny McCarthy, Dr. Oz, etc. But some, you might have never guessed. Here are five celebrities you might not have known are swimming deep in the sea of homeopathy and conspiracy theories in the S.S. Woke.

*Note, this article does not contain source links, as it’s intended to be a tad more on the casual reading side. If, however, you doubt any of these statements, I am more than happy to provide a source.

♥ Maranda





1.    Billy Corgan – Singer of The Smashing Pumpkins
The Smashing Pumpkins were a popular alternative rock band in the 90s, probably most well-known for their songs ‘Cherub Rock’ and ‘Bullet With Butterfly Wings.’ Giant baby-man Lead singer, Billy Corgan, has recently made a point to remind everyone that, hey, even though nobody listens to The Smashing Pumpkins anymore, he can still spew terrible garbage out of his mouth.

In one of his many Alex Jones interviews, (Yeah, he’s had many. I feel like that statement alone could be the only thing I say here and sum it all up) Billy Corgan spent an hour rambling about a ton of out-there stuff after being introduced by Alex as “A super smart guy.” This interview included Billy comparing social justice warriors to Maoist cult members and being totally cool with KKK marches because free speech. Some truly precious quotes from this one interview include….


“5-35% of the population is either asleep, or doesn’t wanna be woken up.”
What? Where does this statistic come from? Asleep OR doesn’t wanna be woken up? How can you not want to be woken up if you’re not asleep? “Asleep”, in this context, means the opposite of being awake/woke. Awake/woke being someone who is supposedly super smart

“It’s hard not to stare at somebody when they’re in the zeitgeist.”
Here, someone being in the zeitgeist means that they’re part of the grand media/government conspiracy to keep the world “asleep”. Billy finds his breath taken away by the mere sight of someone who impedes on society with dat zeitgeist.

“[Alex Jones] and I have spent 57,000 hours examining certain parts of the entertainment or the governmental structure. We can see things breaking long before anybody else can.”
Amazing. Truly, you guys are like Nostradamus Junior 1 and 2. American civilization would be lost without your predictions. But, 57,000 hours? That’s 6.5 YEARS. Tell me, Billy Man-Baby, how did you and Alex accomplish this? Is this 6.5 years each or split between the two of you? Was it 6.5 non-stop years or broken up? Did you take breaks to sleep? I guess not since you guys are so “awake.”

Billy also writes a blog, where he can be quoted saying he believes the swine flu was a man-made virus, and to bring up his anti-vaccine views:

“I have read reports from people who say (as doctors) that there is evidence to suggest this virus was created by man; to call it Swine Flu is then a misnomer, as it really is Swine Flu plus some other stuff stitched together . . . I for one will not be taking the vaccine. I do not trust those who make the vaccines, or the apparatus behind it all to push it on us thru fear . . . That is what holistic life is about: a willingness to look at all the facts or opinions.”

Nobody puts Billy in the corner. No vaccine, no government, or media will ever get him down. He knows the truth. He is truly woke.




2.     Jessica Alba
You may remember Jessica Alba from movies such as ‘Sin City’, ‘Honey’, ‘The Love Guru’ (I hope not), and Good Luck Chuck. In which she played “You know! That chick! Kinda young, brown hair, B-list actress! Name starts with a J?”

"uhhh..."


However, as of late, Jessica Alba has changed her focus from acting to create ‘The Honest Company’, a company that makes organic formula, diapers, wipes, cleaning products, vitamins, and sunscreen that doesn’t actually offer and sun protection.

So what’s supposedly so “Honest” about The Honest Company?

To be honest (see what I did there?), I can get behind a lot of the The Honest Company's message. I can get behind green, sustainable, attractive looking baby products. Let's face it, a lot of diapers are hideous or tacky. Traditional, disposable diapers are terrible for the environment. If this alone was The Honest Company's goal and message, I'd be a customer.

However, Jessica Alba and her company have made a common mistake: They have bought and sold into the idea that "organic" goes hand in hand with green, sustainable products. As I have briefly discussed before, this just isn't the case. Infact, organic farming is worse for the environment than traditional agricultural methods. This pairing of organic with environmental stability is common, and helps perpetuate the myth that they go hand-in-hand, which clearly isn’t the case.

Another woo-ey factor of The Honest Company’s practices are their goal to “reduce toxics [SIC] in all products and packaging” which encourages people to believe that, one, other formulas and diapers are “toxic”, and like the organic thing, feeds into chemophobia. As is the case in most products that tout their lack of toxins, The Honest Company fails to let us know which toxins are not included in the product, what exactly those toxins are and do, and why the dose has no effect on the toxicity


3.    Paul McCartney

Paul McCartney was the founding member and lead singer of Wings, as well as a successful solo artist. He was also a founding member of a pretty unknown, indie rock band known as The Beatles. I doubt you’ve heard of them.


"He loves woo yeah, yeah, yeah!" <- literally the worst joke I could think of.

When not busy being one of the most influential people in music of all-time, McCartney is quite the activist, including for animal rights and environmental sustainability, and while most of his activism is noble and solid, some is not so much.

In 1999, Paul spent £3,000,000 (approx. $3,330,000 USD in 1999) to ensure that Linda McCartney Foods (His company that sells a large variety of vegetarian products, named after his late wife and animal activist Linda McCartney) was kept free of GMOs after finding that some of the products had been “contaminated” with less than 0.5% of GMO soy. What did they do after this “contamination?” Replaced the soy with organic wheat.

Oh, and closed and steam cleaned the entire factory to ensure it was “a GMO-freezone”

I don't wanna hate on or put down Linda McCartney Foods, much like The Honest Company, they truly seem charming and like their heart is in the right place. But, again, we're not talking about heart, feelings, or intentions. We're talking about facts, and the fact is that GMOs are perfectly safe. And making the point to market the food as safer, of higher quality, and healthier, simply because it is organic, free of artificial colors, artificial flavors, and preservatives is simply promoting psuedo-science.

And though I cannot verify its accuracy, as I cannot find its origin, Paul McCartney is quoted on several homeopathic websites as having said “I can't manage without homeopathy. In fact, I never go anywhere without homeopathic remedies. I often make use of them.” (If anyone can find the origin of this quote, or even somewhere proving he never said it, I'd very much appreciate it)


4.    Samuel L. Jackson

(Thanks to Lori from PVPG for this suggestion!)

Ahh another beloved celebrity for me to shut down. I bet you didn’t guess Samuel L. Jackson of Pulp Fiction, Django Unchained, The Avengers, Jurassic Park, Snakes on a Plane, The Incredibles, Coach Carter, Die Hard with a Vengeance, Star Wars: Episode III, and Black Snake Moan would be into woo.



To be honest, I spent a long time figuring out how I could incorporate this image here.

I don’t like writing this (or the previous or next entry) because I truly do like SLJ. I find him to be a great actor, even in terrible movies, and he seems to be one of the least awful people in Hollywood.

But nobody said this job would be easy, and dammit I must do it.

So what is Samuel’s sin of woo? Cupping.

Cupping, while definitely not one of the more common forms of woo, is the act of suctioning cups to a “patient’s” skin (usually back) to “heal or detox” them. SLJ posted a picture back in April of him getting cupping done, specifically, wet cupping, where the skin is punctured with a needle before the cup is suctioned on. This not only forces your skin up into this glorified diva cup, but also draws your blood out.

Cupping, like a lot of woo, is a form of old-school medicine. There is evidence that the Egyptians, the Greeks, and even Hippocrates used cupping as a medical treatment, and it is still practiced in “traditional Chinese medicine” today.  Again, while not common, this is a typical woo of the “people used to do it all the time so it must be awesome” variety.



"Getting a hole drilled into your skull for seizures, mental disorders, and head injuries? Well, I mean, as long as people in medicine used to do it and don't anymore, sign me up!"

In all reality, I don’t take a huge issue with SLJ going out and getting his back stabbed and sucked, whatever floats your goat, dude. I do, however, take a huge issue with the promotion of it. While he did not explicitly go into much detail of the procedure, he posted it, picture and name, on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, thus inviting potentially millions of people into the land that Woo built. As you're probably noticing, this is a common pattern here.


5.    Jim Carrey

I didn’t want to do this. Of this entire list, this is the one I wanted to write the least.
There are some famous people who are almost universally well-liked. John Stamos, Ellen DeGeneres, the Lucky Charms guy, and Jim Carrey.

Jim Carrey has starred in several hit movies, mostly comedies, such as The Mask, Bruce Almighty, Dumb and Dumber, Ace Venture, The Grinch, Liar Liar, Yes Man, Me Myself and Irene, and several more. I Love You Phillip Morris, The Truman Show, and Fun with Dick and Jane are admittedly three of my favorite movies.

So it is with a particularly high level of sadness to inform you that Jim Carrey is a proponent of anti-vaccine woo-y garbage.






It’s easy and logical to assume that Jim Carrey became a loud, anti-vaxxer during his relationship with Hollywood’s most famous woo-pusher: Jenny McCarthy. But unfortunately, once their relationship ended, the woo train kept on chugging along.

Unfortunately, Jim here can’t just keep it to himself. Or even roll like SLJ and just say “Hey, I don’t vaccinate.” and leave it at that (which is bad enough.) Oh no, he has to go COMPLETELY off the wall and get LOUD with it.  If he weren’t a celebrity, I would almost feel like this was a cry for help, like an 8-year-old burning ants with a magnifying glass.
Some examples of this include….





Oh… Oh boy… Maybe if I read these with one eyebrow raised, and an Ace Ventura voice, it won’t be so bad. No? Still terrible… Okay..

\Well, Jim, I’m not here to debunk, just discuss. But, in case anyone reading is wondering? The poison’s in the dose.  And the dose of mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde in vaccines is not deadly or harmful to humans, including infants. 

You get mercury in a lot of ways other than vaccines, including breast milk and seafood. You get formaldehyde in a lot of ways like mouth wash, cough drops, and pears. And, finally, you get aluminum in a lot of ways. In fact, according to the CDC, the average person takes in an estimated 30-50 mg of aluminum every day, mainly from foods, drinking water, and medicines. Even so, not all vaccines contain aluminum, and the ones that do only contain about 1% of the average amount the average person takes in every day. Not 1% of a -deadly- amount, 1% of an *average* amount.

Oh, and as far as whining about government mandated vaccines? Your right to throw your fists around ends at my face, and when you don’t vaccinate yourself or your children, you put my face, my child’s face, immunocompromised faces, elderly faces, babies too young to be vaccinated faces, and pregnant faces at risk of disease and illness. And if you’re okay with giving babies’ diseases, then I think your problem lies less with vaccines and lies more with you being a terrible person.

And thus, we conclude our list. It may have broken your heart, maybe you already knew all of these celebrities were into woo. Maybe, like me, you realized that finding celebrities who are actually outspoken advocates for science, is more difficult to find than celebrities who sing the praises of homeopathy.  But that, is for another post.


Hugs, kisses, and Merck checks! ♥

Woo or True?: Placenta Consumption for Prevention of Post-Partum Depression


This is something I’m experimenting on. I’ve thus far taken a very long creative break from blogging. I have a long list of ideas that I need to actually work out, but this one is my favorite. I call it “Woo or True?”
 
In “Woo or True?” I will discuss a parenting topic I see debated and discussed often and whether or not it is scientifically sound. As per usual, I source as much as I can, and my source list can be found at the very end of this blog. I welcome any and all suggestions for topics. These posts will also be attempted to be kept as a somewhat light read.

I do personally apologize for the LONG break of posts here on Back From Nature. Enjoy!

Maranda


An often underestimated topic in the natural parenting community is placenta consumption. It’s a topic I saw more often than almost any other, and yet it is also one I almost never see discussed on science-based parenting blogs, websites, or groups. I, myself, had wanted to consume mine. I can still recall reading placenta pot roast recipes online. 


“I ate my placenta with some fava beans and a nice chianti”

In fact, there are people with entire careers based on placental encapsulation (the act of steaming, dehydrating and grinding the placenta before putting it into a pill) for new mothers. Mothers, doulas, and midwives of various backgrounds can be found promoting consumption either by cooking it as any other meat, raw, encapsulated, or in smoothies. But where’s the proof? What does placentophagy (the consumption of placenta) supposedly even do? Does it completely prevent the PPD or just alleviate it?
 
What they say it does:

I truly felt better shortly after taking them--on mornings when I felt sluggish or anxious, I could feel a change in my body after taking the pills.” [1]

The difference between my first two postpartum periods and the third was simply amazing! Instead of about five days of crying and feeling totally overwhelmed, even paranoid, I experienced one afternoon of teariness and then I was able to recognize that my feelings were related to hormones. I felt more in control than I had with my first babies and so much happier.” [2]

“The placenta is thought to be rich in nutrients that the mother needs to recover more readily from childbirth. . . . Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conducted a study that focused on CRH (Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone). . . . They concluded that the placenta secreted so much CRH that the hypothalamus stopped producing it. Once the placenta was born, it took some time for the hypothalamus to get the signal that the CRH levels were low, and to begin producing it again.” [3]*

           Proof that it’s true:

Well, not much.  Like a lot of things in the world of woo, I seemed to find that most of the “proof” of the benefits of placental consumption came from moms all boasting about it to eachother. If you find this to count as evidence, I wish to direct you here.

Listed in my third source above, was a few studies. Now, I had to google it, as their source link was dead, but I did find the 1995 Discover study on CRH and PPD. [4]

Human placenta is also used in traditional Chinese medicine.

Proof that it’s woo:

           Firstly, I’d like to point out that nowhere in the study on CRH and PPD was placental consumption ever discussed or brought up or researched. Not once. Consumption was not part of the study. The conclusion was made, clearly, in the part of the author of the post as well as other placental consumption advocates, who made the conclusion that “If I lose this and get depressed, then when I eat it it’ll make me not depressed.” 

Placental encapsulation businesses are also held to absolutely no standards, guidelines, or rules. There is no body that sets regulations for how a placenta must be handled when encapsulated. As a result, the dangers of having someone take your placenta and encapsulate it are many. They could be throwing your placenta in the toilet, they could be throwing it in the garbage and giving you ground up hair. Dramatic, but truly the risk of strangers without training or mandation on encapsulation.

 “Well,” you may be saying “I’m not having someone else encapsulate my placenta! I will be handling it all on my own!”

In 2012, Michelle Beacock of Edge Hill university conducted a study published in the British Journal of Midwifery that found that evidence of proof behind anecdotes about placental consumption is limited, dated, and ultimately inconclusive. [5]

In 2015, Northwestern University in Illinois conducted a review published in Archives of Women’s Mental Health. The review looked at placenta-consumption related research since 1950 and could not find any data to support the claims that eating the placenta raw, cooked, or in pill form carried any health benefits. Also in the review, was the fact that there are no studies which look at the actual risks of placental consumption. [6]

And do I really have to debunk traditional Chinese medicine?

           So, is it woo or true?

           SURVEY SAYS….. WOO!

           There is nothing current, detailed, and conclusive that supports this idea that placental consumption will prevent PPD. The closest thing to that evidence is anecdote, which as you know, simply is not enough. There are also no studies that address the potential risks.

           Back From Nature, and science, firmly recommend that you do NOT eat your placenta for any reason.

           You wouldn’t eat poop. You wouldn’t eat vomit. You wouldn’t eat your liver. Please, don’t eat your placenta.



SOURCES:

[1]          Milioto, Biba (October 22, 2013)                                http://www.xojane.com/healthy/why-placenta-encapsulation-is-the-smartest-post-partum-decision-i-could-have-made “Why Placenta Encapsulation Is The Smartest Post-Partum Decision I Could Have Made”
 
[2]          Sarah     http://placentabenefits.info/testimonials.asp

[3]          Selander, Jodi                                                    http://placentabenefits.info/medicinal.asp “Placenta for Healing”
* A fun note on this source. While this post discusses the benefits of placenta for healing, including stopping hemorrhaging, preventing PPD, promoting breast milk production, enhancing pain tolerance, etc, there is a disclaimer at the bottom that says: “This site is for informational purposes only. It does not intend to treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” I found this particularly interesting because, while this legal disclaimer claims this is not intended to treat a disease, it seems fairly obvious that is exactly what the intention is. This is one of many examples of truly sneaky practices made by woo-promoters in order to provide bogus health advice without getting sued when it doesn't work.

[4]          Ilona S. Yim, PhD, Laura M. Glynn, PhD, Christine Dunkel Schetter, PhD, Calvin J. Hobel, MD, Aleksandra Chicz-DeMet, PhD, and Curt A. Sandman, PhD (1995)                     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768579/ “Elevated Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone in Human Pregnancy Increases the Risk of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms”

[5]          Beacock, Michelle (July 1, 2012)                 http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.7.464 “Does eating placenta offer postpartum health benefits?”

[6]          Cynthia W. Coyle, Kathryn E. Hulse, Katherine L. Wisner, Kara E. Driscoll, Crystal T. Clark (October 2015)                Archives of Women’s Mental Health, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 673-680 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00737-015-0538-8 (Placentophagy: therapeutic miracle or myth?)  --OR-- http://www.bbc.com/news/health-33006384