We were sheeple following the tie-dye herd. We believed that nature provided all the answers we needed to raising happy and healthy children. We were wrong, and children are in danger because of parents who, like us, are misled and duped by unchecked "crunchy" culture and irresponsible proponents of alternative medicine. Now dedicated advocates for vaccines and evidence-based parenting, we-- Maranda Dynda, Juniper Russo, and Megan Sandlin-- are on a mission to make a difference.
Poisoned by a Vaccine-- and Assaulted by a Turtle
Recently, this list has been making the rounds in anti-vaccine circles, as proof that vaccine-related deaths are real. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes are part of a standardized system used to facilitate communication between medical experts, researchers, and insurance companies. Anti-vaxxers believe that, because they include poisoning by vaccines, that must mean that vaccine poisoning is a real and common thing.
At first glance, it certainly looks suspicious. Why would insurance companies even have the option of billing for vaccine poisoning, unless it's something that actually happens with some degree of regularity?
In short, the answer is that there are ICD-9 codes for everything. And I mean everything. Not only can you also find poisoning entries for every conceivable medical substance that exists, but the ICD-9 list, which has over 68,000 entries, also includes some pretty bizarre and even inconceivable injuries. Here are a few of my favorites from both ICD-9 and its follow-up version, ICD-10.
974.1: Poisoning by purine derivative diuretics including theobromine
Literally, actually death by chocolate.
V91.07XA: Burn due to water skis on fire, initial encounter
Distinct from its counterpart entry for people who have had subsequent encounters with burning water skis.
T62.0X3: Toxic effects of ingested mushrooms, assault
Not just poisoning from mushrooms, but, y'know... those times when you're assaulted with mushrooms. Or by mushrooms. I'm not sure.
W59.22XD: Struck by a turtle, subsequent encounter
This person hasn't just been hit by a turtle-- not bitten, but struck by a turtle-- but it's happened more than once.
V97.33XD: Sucked into a jet engine, subsequent encounter
The only person in the world with worse luck than the victim of a serial attack-turtle... was apparently sucked into a jet engine and survived long enough to be sucked into another jet engine later on.
W55.29XA: Other contact with a cow, subsequent encounter
"Other" contact with a cow. My brain goes to some strange and disturbing places trying to imagine what gets this entry.
V00.01XD: Pedestrian on foot injured in collision with roller skater, subsequent encounter.
I hate it when I get hit by a roller skater more than once.
X52.XXXA: Prolonged stay in weightless environment.
Well, astronauts need medical care too, right?
V95.45: Spacecraft explosion injuring occupant
Because when a rocket ship explodes, the occupants are definitely going to survive long enough to be treated and billed for their injuries.
W22.0XD: Walked into a lamppost, subsequent encounter
Okay, guys, we all do things when we're drunk or texting, but I think this is something you get a pass for exactly one time. If you're having subsequent collisions with lamp posts, you need help.
Bottom line? Yes, there are insurance code entries for poisoning by vaccines. But that doesn't mean that vaccine poisoning is an epidemic, or even that it has necessarily ever happened. Unless you're also willing to use the ICD-9 and ICD-10 as evidence that our Reptilian Overlords are covering up an epidemic of turtle attacks, it's patently nonsense to use it as evidence of an epidemic of vaccine-related poisoning.
Labels:
anti-vaccine,
diagnosis codes,
evidence-based medicine,
funny,
humor,
ICD-10,
ICD-9,
meme,
vaccines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am 100% on the side of science, but would just like to note that "initial encounter" and "subsequent encounter" have to do with the healthcare provider's contact with the patient, not with the number of times the patient was injured in a given way.
ReplyDeleteI'm probably ruining the joke, but science does that almost as often as it makes for good jokes, so.
Thanks for all you do!